Sistem Monitoring Bukti Digital Untuk Meningkatkan Kontrol Terhadap Kasus Cybercrime Di Indonesia

  • Krisna Widatama Universitas Muhammadiyah Purworejo
Keywords: Computer crime, Digital evidence, Physical evidence

Abstract

Nowadays, the computer technology is growing rapidly. This has a positive impact, many people can be helped by the computer. In addition, the types of jobs available are in-creasing. But, there are also negative impacts, for example the computer crimes are growing dramatically. The komputer crimes will be handled where the place of computer crime occurred at the District Level (POLSEK). The problem occurs is when police agen-cies at the District Level do not have tools to investigate digital evidence. So the proce-dure to handle this computer crime is send the physical evidence to the Regional Level (POLDA) to be acquired and analyzed.
It will make the digital evidence vulnerable to be acquired and manipulated when the physical evidence is sent to the Regional Police Agency by people who do not have au-thority. It is necessary to renew the procedure for handling digital evidence in the case of a computer crime and integrated system between them.
This study will produce a procedure for handling digital evidence through an integrated monitoring system between POLSEK and POLDA agencies. It is hoped that through this monitoring system, authenticity can be maintained and the digital evidence can be ac-cepted by judge in the court.

Author Biography

Krisna Widatama, Universitas Muhammadiyah Purworejo

Academic profile: ScholarSinta

References

Agus, A. A., & Riskawati. (2016). Penanganan Kasus Cyber Crime di Kota Makassar (Studi pada Kantor Kepolisian Resort Kota Besar Makassar). Jurnal Supremasi, 11(1), 20–29.

Giova, G. (2011). Improving Chain of Custody in Forensic Investigation of Electronic Digital Systems. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 11(1), 1–9. Retrieved from http://paper.ijcsns.org/07_book/201101/20110101.pdf

Hibshi, H., Vidas, T., & Cranor, L. (2003). Usability of Forensics Tools : A User Study.

Jaishankar, K. (2018). Cyber Criminology As An Academic Discipline: History, Contribution and Impact. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 12(1), 1–8.

Prayudi, Y., Ashari, A., & Priyambodo, T. K. (2014). Digital Evidence Cabinets: A Proposed Frameworks for Handling Digital Chain of Custody. International Journal Of Computer Applications (IJCA), 109(9), 30–36. https://doi.org/10.5120/18781-0106

Reith, M., Carr, C., & Gunsch, G. (2002). An Examination of Digital Forensic Models. International Journal of Digital Evidence, 1(3), 1–12.

Roscini, M. (2016). Digital Evidence as a Means of Proof before the International Court of Justice. Journal of Conflict and Security Law, 31(3), 541–554.

Widatama, K., & Yudi Prayudi. (2017). Konsep Lemari Penyimpanan Bukti Digital Menggunakan Struktur Bahasa XML. Seminar Nasional Informatika Dan Aplikasinya Ke-3, (September), 23.

Yusoff, Y., Ismail, R., & Hassan, Z. (2011). Common Phases of Computer Forensics Investigation Models. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology, 3(3), 17–31.

Published
2019-05-30
How to Cite
Widatama, K. (2019). Sistem Monitoring Bukti Digital Untuk Meningkatkan Kontrol Terhadap Kasus Cybercrime Di Indonesia. INTEK : Jurnal Informatika Dan Teknologi Informasi, 2(1), 39-46. https://doi.org/10.37729/intek.v2i1.88
Section
Articles