Implementation of Legal Certainty, Justice, and Expediency in the Pretrial Case of the Alleged Criminal Offense of Misusing the Transportation of Fuel Oil (Study of the Decision Number 21/Pid.Pra/2022/PN Kpg and Number 22/Pid.Pra/2022/PN Kpg)

Jeremia Alexander  Wewo; Otlief J.R  Wewo

doi:10.37729/amnesti.v5i2.3390

Jeremia Alexander Wewo Universitas Kristen Artha Wacana, Nusa Tenggara Timur, Indonesia
Otlief J.R Wewo Universitas Kristen Artha Wacana, Nusa Tenggara Timur, Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.37729/amnesti.v5i2.3390

Keywords: Judge's Decision, Pretrial, Certainty, Justice, Benefit

Abstract

After the Constitutional Court Decision No. 21/PUU-XII/2014 dated April 28, 2015, the authority of pretrial object in Article 77 of KUHAP has expanded to include testing the validity of the determination of a suspect. This has also been confirmed in the Supreme Court Regulation Number 4 of 2016 concerning Prohibition of Review of Pretrial Decision Article (2) number (1) letter (a) which explicitly or explicitly states that the object of pretrial includes the validity of the determination of a suspect. This study aims to analyze the judge's decision in the pretrial case of alleged criminal acts of misusing the transportation of fuel oil in accordance or not with the aspects of legal certainty, justice, and benefit as using normative legal research methods. The results of the study found that pretrial decisions Number 21/Pid.Pra/2022/PN.Kpg and Number 22/Pid.Pra/2022/PN.Kpg were in accordance or based on aspects of certainty, justice, and legal benefits. The suggestion given by the author is the need for preventive efforts in the form of dismissal and impeachment of the law done by the law enforcement agency, the Police and the Prosecutor’s Office about the regulation of the abuse of oil fuel transportation (BBM) and also the need to do a repressive effort of giving a sanction explicitly for those who deliberately take legal action to smuggle oil fuel (BBM).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amin, R., Manalu, I., Hemert, W. A. Van, & Al-Aziz, M. F. (2022). Penyelesaian Ganti Kerugian Dalam Perkara Pidana Berdasarkan Penetapan Praperadilan: Studi Di Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Selatan. Jurnal Hukum Sasana, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.31599/sasana.v8i1.974

Apriansah, Y., & Waluyo, B. (2021). Kajian Yuridis Putusan Praperadilan atas Penangkapan Ravio Patra (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Nomor 63/ Pid.Prap/2020 PN.Jkt.Sel). Humani (Hukum Dan Masyarakat Madani), 11(1), 179–192.

Arzaky, M. D. W., & Tanudjaja. (2023). Kepastian Pemberian Ganti Kerugian melalui Putusan Praperadilan (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 10/Pid.Pra/2022/PN.MTR). Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political, 3(1), 1043–1071.

Benuf, K., & Azhar, M. (2020). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum sebagai Instrumen Mengurai Permasalahan Hukum Kontemporer. Jurnal Gema Keadilan, 7(1), 20–33.

Darwin, D., Dahlan, D., & Suhaimi, S. (2019). Analisis Yuridis Putusan Praperadilan dalam Perspektif Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Jurnal Mercatoria, 12(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.31289/mercatoria.v12i1.2363

Firdaus, I., Dewi, A. A. S. L., & Karma, N. M. S. (2020). Praperadilan Penetapan Status Tersangka Dalam Dugaan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Analogi Hukum, 2(3), 366–371. https://doi.org/10.22225/ah.2.3.2516.366-371

Firmansyah, S. H., & Farid, A. M. (2022). Politik Hukum Praperadilan sebagai Lembaga Perlindungan Hak Tersangka Ditinjau dari Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 21/PUU-XII/2014 mengenai Penetapan Tersangka. Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Dan Keadilan, 3(2), 90–103. https://doi.org/10.18196/jphk.v3i2.15195

Hasan, Z., & Lestari, S. C. (2022). Pertimbangan Hukum Diterimanya Pengajuan Praperadilan Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi Proyek Jalan Di Kabupaten Lampung Timur. Muhammadiyah Law Review, 6(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.24127/lr.v6i1.1844

Hutasuhut, R. R., & Fadlian, A. (2021). Praperadilan Atas Penetapan Tersangka Diluar Ketentuan KUHAP. Jurnal Ilmiah Living Law, 13(2), 91–99.

Marbun, R. (2021). Trikotomi Relasi dalam Penetapan Tersangka: Menguji Frasa “Pemeriksaan Calon Tersangka” Melalui Praperadilan. Undang: Jurnal Hukum, 4(1), 159–190. https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.4.1.159-190

Marzuki, P. M. (2009). Penelitian Hukum.

Moho, H. (2019). Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia Menurut Aspek Kepastian Hukum, Keadilan, dan Kemanfaatan. Jurnal Warta, 13(1), 138–149.

Pattiruhu, F., Adu, S., & Wewo, J. A. (2020). Analisis terhadap Perkara Praperadilan yang Tidak Dinyatakan Gugur sesuai Putusan Mahkamah Konsitusi. Jatiswara, 35(1), 1–18.

Pramana, R. A., Ismail, & Martua, J. (2020). Studi Putusan Hakim Menolak Permohonan Praperadilan terhadap Terbitnya SP3 (Surat Perintah Penghentian Penyidikan) Putusan No.06/Pra.P/2018/PN.Tjb. Jurnal Tectum, 1(2), 201–207.

Rahman, W. (2019). Wewenang Praperadilan: Memeriksa dan Memutus Penetapan Tersangka. De Jure: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum, 4(1), 167–177.

Setiawan, P. J. (2020). Sistem Pemulihan Kerugian Integratif Bagi Korban Penipuan Skala Masif di Indonesia. Kertha Patrika, 42(3), 230. https://doi.org/10.24843/kp.2020.v42.i03.p02

Siswanto, A. (2021). Permohonan Praperadilan dalam Upaya Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Lex Crimen, X(4), 81–90.

Sofian, A., & Hasibuan, B. M. (2020). Pengaturan dan Praktek Praperadilan Tindak Pidana Pajak di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Dan Pembangunan, 50(3), 701–718.

Wewo, J. A., Stefanus, K. Y., & Pekuwaki, U. L. (2018). Code of Ethics Urgency in the Implementation of General Election in Indonesia. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 18(2), 194–199. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2018.18.2.1744

Widyastuti, I. A. W., Dewi, A. A. S. L., & Sugiartha, I. N. G. (2020). Kewenangan Pengadilan Negeri Memutus Perkara Praperadilan Mengenai Tidak Sahnya Penetapan Tersangka. Jurnal Analogi Hukum, 2(3), 351–355. https://doi.org/10.22225/ah.2.3.2519.351-355