Criminal Responsibility for Defendants in Online Gambling Crimes under Article 303 Paragraph (1) Number 2 of the Indonesian Penal Code (A Case Study of Verdict Number 145/Pid.B/2024/PN.Lmg)

  • Bambang Hariyanto Universitas Islam Darul 'Ulum Lamongan, Jawa Timur, Indonesia
  • Cipto Kuncoro Universitas Islam Darul 'Ulum Lamongan, Jawa Timur, Indonesia
  • Moh. Hudi Universitas Islam Darul 'Ulum Lamongan, Jawa Timur, Indonesia
  • Siti Afiyah Universitas Islam Darul 'Ulum Lamongan, Jawa Timur, Indonesia
  • Ariefah Sundari Universitas Islam Darul 'Ulum Lamongan, Jawa Timur, Indonesia

Abstract

Online gambling is a modern criminal phenomenon that has rapidly developed in Indonesia, in line with the increasing penetration and utilisation of information technology across various aspects of societal life. The ease of access, the anonymity of perpetrators, and its cross-border reach render online gambling a complex form of crime that is difficult to eradicate through conventional law enforcement mechanisms. This situation gives rise to legal issues concerning regulation and the imposition of sanctions, particularly in determining whether the elements of online gambling offences can be fully subsumed under the elements of gambling as stipulated in the Indonesian Penal Code. This study aims to analyse the conformity of the elements of online gambling offences with the provisions of Article 303 paragraph (1) number 2 of the Indonesia Penal Code, as well as to examine the legal considerations employed by judges in delivering verdicts on online gambling cases. The research is conducted using normative legal methods, employing statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, with a focus on Decision Number 145/Pid.B/2024/PN.Lmg as the primary reference. The findings reveal that online gambling shares substantial elements with conventional gambling, yet differs in terms of media and modus operandi. These differences necessitate the application of specific legal provisions (lex specialis), as regulated under Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions. Furthermore, the analysis of judicial considerations indicates that electronic evidence and contextual legal interpretation, aligned with technological developments, are key factors in ensuring verdicts that are responsive to the dynamics of modern crime.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Angellina, P., & Prasetyo, B. (2024). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Terhadap Pelaku yang Mempromosikan Judi Online. Ranah Research : Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development, 7(2), 946–952. https://doi.org/10.38035/rrj.v7i2.1395

Arief, B. N. (2011). Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana : Perkembangan Penyusunan Konsep KUHP Baru. Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Azzuhri, A. (2025). Regulating Crimes under Muslim Law and European Civil Law Framework in Indonesia: Lottery Gambling as a Case Study. Journal of Islamic Law, 6(1), 200–232.

Bentara, B., Iskandar, I., Setianingrat, E., Permana, D. Y., & Dikrurahman, D. (2025). Legal Responsibility For Perpetrators Of Online Gambling Crimes. Journal of World Science, 4(5), 512–521. https://doi.org/10.58344/jws.v4i5.1408

Gainsbury, S. M., & Blaszczynski, A. (2020). Digital Gambling Payment Methods: Harm Minimization Policy Considerations. Gaming Law Review, 24(7), 466–472. https://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2020.0015

Igomu, A., Muliyono, A., & Bonggoibo, A. A. (2024). Judi Online : Permainan Menggiurkan dengan Risiko yang Menguras Harta dan Masa Depan. Al-Mahkamah: Jurnal Hukum, Politik Dan Pemerintahan, 01(02).

Moeljatno. (1983). Perbuatan Pidana dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana dalam Hukum Pidana. Bina Aksara.

Sangwan, G. D. (2025). Critical Study of the Financial Trends and Governance Issues in the Online Gaming and Gambling Industry. Proceedings of the Innovative Multidisciplinary Approaches to Global Challenges: Sustainability, Equity, and Ethics in an Interconnected World (IMASEE 2025), Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research 931, 224–252. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-416-7_11

Soekanto, S., & Mamuji, S. (2011). Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat.

Sudarto. (1981). Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana. Alumni.

Sulaiman, N., & Yusuf, H. (2024). Tindak Pidana Ekonomi dalam Konteks Judi Online: Analisis Hukum dan Dampaknya Terhadap Stabilitas Ekonomi Masyarakat. JICN: Jurnal Intelek Dan Cendikiawan Nusantara, 1(6), 10885–10895.

Syuib, M., Rani, F. A., Gani, I. A., & Ilyas. (2024). The Position od Special Laws (Lex Specialis) Within the Indonesia Legal System. Russian Law Journal, 6(2), 1202–1209.

Taubayev, B. R., Seriev, B. A., & Issakhov, B. S. (2025). Gambling in the Digital Era and Criminological Challenges of Crimes in Online Gambling. Bulletin of L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University Law Series, 150(1), 176–190. https://doi.org/10.32523/2616-6844-2025-150-1-176-190

Tumanggger, D. S. R., & Yusuf, H. (2025). Analisis Kriminologis Terhadap Perkembangan Perjudian Online Di Indonesia. Integrative Perspectives of Social and Science Journal (IPSSJ), 2(2), 2725–2734.

Widijowati, R. D., Pecson, R. C., & Kristiawanto. (2025). the Online Gambling As a Criminal Offense Which Disturbs Society on Legal Perspective. Jurnal Hukum Unissula, 41(2), 461–489. https://doi.org/10.26532/jh.v41i2.43373

Published
2025-08-04
How to Cite
Hariyanto, B., Kuncoro, C., Hudi, M., Afiyah, S., & Sundari, A. (2025). Criminal Responsibility for Defendants in Online Gambling Crimes under Article 303 Paragraph (1) Number 2 of the Indonesian Penal Code (A Case Study of Verdict Number 145/Pid.B/2024/PN.Lmg). Amnesti: Jurnal Hukum, 7(2), 149-163. https://doi.org/10.37729/amnesti.v7i2.6717
Section
Articles